logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.03 2015나57392
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the Plaintiff’s KRW 115,710,877 against the Defendant among the judgment of the first instance, and its related thereto, from May 12, 2010 to November 3, 2017.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Part 3 to 4 of the judgment of the first instance court in the third 3 to 3-4 of the judgment of the first instance, "the mother and the plaintiff D shall be the punishment of the plaintiff A, and they shall be the mother and the mother".

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the "No. 4-1 through No. 3" of the judgment of the court of first instance with "No. 4-1 through No. 6".

The 3th page 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written on the 3th page 12 of the judgment, "the results of physical evaluation commissioned to the director of the National University of Indonesia and the results of fact inquiry" of the first instance court.

The following shall be added to the "the first place of the decision of the first instance" in the fourth page of the decision.

According to the results of the fact-finding with respect to the director of the Gangnam-gu University of the party branch, the plaintiff A's main doctor is not diagnosed as a transition disorder, and the transition disorder is deemed to be one of the diagnosiss that can be considered if the patient's walking failure symptoms are excluded in the rehabilitation department evaluation, but seven years have passed since the date of the accident, rather than the following two.

A. (2) On June 25, 2018, which is the date near the date of the “five-year Han Market Sea” in paragraph (2) of the same Article, the “each calculation sheet” in Section 4-9 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be added to the “Calculation sheet” in the “Calculation sheet inasmuch as it is difficult to easily reject the results of the above physical appraisal commission made only on the date near the date of the instant accident.

The 4th page 12 of the decision of the first instance court shall be referred to as "this Court" as "the first instance court".

The "Date of the closure of pleadings" in the 5th sentence of the first instance court shall be applied to the "date of the closure of pleadings" in the 5th sentence.

In the 5th sentence of the first instance court, "from September 4, 2015, which is the day following the closing date of pleadings" shall be referred to in the 5th sentence.

arrow