logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2015.05.21 2014고단3044
개인정보보호법위반등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, each of the above Defendants is against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B B B B B, on February 2014, before the fact that the candidates registered as preliminary candidates for the local local election D market nationwide are participating in the D market candidate recruitment process for the newly recruited party members, he tried to help the candidates to participate in the D market candidate recruitment process for the new E, and the defendant A, the chairman of the Gyeonggi-do Association for Persons with Disabilities with Disabilities, which was known to the usual meeting, proposed the above candidates to help the above candidates and proposed the above candidates, and then the Defendants, using the F Branch List of the Korea Association for Persons with Disabilities to arbitrarily prepare the application form for joining the political party in the name of the above members and to have them join the Gyeonggi-do Party Party for the new Eth.

1. A personal information manager in violation of the Personal Information Protection Act shall provide a third person with the consent of a subject of information, unless the personal information manager provides such personal information for the purpose of collecting the personal information, and no person shall be provided with such information with the knowledge that the personal

Defendant

A around February 2, 2014, around the office of the F Branch of the Gyeonggi-do Association of Persons with Disabilities with Disabilities with the Three Floors of the G Center, around the 800 members' name, resident registration number, disability grade, etc. of the above association members H, etc., which were managed as the president of the branch of the above association, were delivered to Defendant B without the consent of each member. Defendant B received the list with the knowledge of the above circumstances.

As a result, Defendant A provided personal information to Defendant B without the consent of the subject of information, and Defendant B was provided with it.

2. On February 2014, in order to assist the Defendants in forging private documents and uttering private documents, the Defendants entered approximately 10 names, resident registration numbers, addresses, etc. among the members in the form of application for joining the political party without the consent of each member, using the above list of members of the Association.

arrow