logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.08.27 2017고단2565
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 2565"

1. On September 24, 2017, from around 05:41 to around 05:56 the same day, the Defendant: (a) reported six times in total to the effect that “the Defendant 112 calls to 112,” and “the murder incident may occur repeatedly; or (b) reported six times to the effect that “the murder incident may occur”; and (c) was asked the police officers assigned to the Defendant’s house located in the Daegu Western-gu apartment B apartment complex B, Daegu-gu, the Defendant was asked of questions about the details of the report from the police officer E in charge of the police box of the Taegu Police Station, which was called by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant reported ‘drain and her crime is the same,’ and the above slope E, who tried to transmit the field arrival situation in a non-electric field, intended to take a bath to the above slope E, i.e., “I am asked, I am am, I am, I am, I am.”

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the above E’s left part in a way of 3 to 4 occasions so that the above slope E does not go out of the house, and the Defendant was unable to get out of the house.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

2. The Defendant of obstruction of performance of official duties by fraudulent means is a person who has received a report 112 on a total of 264 occasions from April 24, 2017 to September 24, 2017.

At around 05:39 on April 14, 2017, the Defendant reported to the police in relation to the drinking value problem, but did not take any particular measures to guide only the complaint procedure, and reported to the police in 112 on the phone, and reported as if four persons, such as the police officer F, etc., who belongs to the police station D police box that believed the above report to be true, were sent to the Defendant’s residence, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes, treatment of civil petitions, etc.

arrow