A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:25 on February 21, 2013, the Defendant jointly with C and D, on the 23:25th floor of the “F” in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, for the reason that the victim G (24 years of age) dried up a multi-line game machine that the Defendant was playing the Defendant, the Defendant was able to kill the victim’s head by putting the victim’s head into three times, 4-5 times by drinking the victim’s head and chest, and 4-5 times by drinking the victim’s head and chest, C knee, knee, knee, kn the victim’s back with the victim’s boom, and D knish with the victim’s hand.

As a result, the Defendant, while carrying with C, and jointly with D, inflicted injury on the victim, such as cerebral typhosis, salvum salphe, salphe, salphe, salphe, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against D or C;

1. Each police statement made to G, H, I, J, and K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 2 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of an injury to carry dangerous articles), Article 2 (2) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of joint injury) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the following reasons: (a) scope of recommendation and the standards for suspension of execution according to sentencing guidelines for violent crimes with reasons of sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Act; (b) the degree of injury in this case is relatively minor; and (c) the Defendant agreed with the victim.