Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 19:40 on March 17, 2012, the Defendant made a threat to a female on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant’s home located in the Geum-gu Busan Metropolitan City, stating that there was a trial expense by the victim E due to a vehicle parked by the victim E from his wife D once every four times; and (b) the Defendant called “as soon as width, name has been changed, grow, and droped, the Defendant was not entitled to the Privacy Act, and the Defendant was not entitled to the end of the Privacy Act; (c) the Defendant was dead, grow, and was dead, brued, and brued in the future; and (d) there were many other hazards in the future.”

2. On March 18, 2012, around 08:32, the Defendant sent to the victim E’s cell phone from March 17, 2012 to the victim E’s cell phone for the same reasons as paragraph (1), such as “each error in the vehicle number,” etc., to the victim E, on March 17, 2012, from March 19:42 to March 18, 18, 2012, the text causing fear or apprehensions, such as the list of crimes in the attached list, which repeatedly sent to the victim, in writing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing mobile phone text pictures and written sights;

1. Relevant Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 283(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., and Articles 44-7(1)3 and 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., the selection of each fine for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act was conducted to obtain the intent of wrong parking from the victim and constitutes a justifiable act.

However, the defendant's words or text messages.