The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2012, from around 19:25 to 19:45 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) in the E laundry operated by the victim D, the Sung-gu Sung-si B apartment C, Changwon-si, 103, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s laund business by force by driving the victim’s laundry on the ground that the victim’s F, who is the Defendant’s wife, does not receive the Defendant’s laundry from bad customers; (b) he is a person doing funeral, and (c) is a person doing clap lab, and is a person doing funeral, for the purpose of taking out laundry from laundry, the Defendant: (d) opened the food waste laundry in the said laundry; and (e) opened the food waste laundry and prevented customers from entering the said laundry prior to laundry.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. A fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (the conversion of KRW 50,000 per day) of the Criminal Act into a workhouse.

4. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code (the first offender is the defendant and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant) of the suspended sentence.