Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a customer who visits a "D" laundry operated by the victim C(43 years of age and inn).

1. Around 21:10 on June 15, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the business, at the “D” laundry site operated by the victim of F-based first floor in Sinposi, Sinpo City E, the victim and the Si expenses were incurred due to the issue of the release of laundry.

The Defendant interfered with the business of laundry by force, on the ground that the victim tolds that laundry cannot be released without a laundry certificate, by preventing customers who were entering the laundry from entering the laundry on the ground that laundry could not be released without a laundry certificate.

2. In the same time and place as the above 1-A, the injured Defendant suffered injury, on the ground that the victim respondeded to another female guest, such as the victim’s satise and satise-in, and the victim’s satise-in and satise-in, one time, and two weeks of satise-in, which requires treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 247(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 247(1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted on the assertion of the defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order asserts that the obstruction of business constitutes a justifiable act and thus the illegality is excluded, since the defendant and the victim's opinion were different regarding the release of laundry.

However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, i.e., the victim, who refers to the notice of the laundry and the Defendant’s release of the laundry.