1. Defendant Gangnamnam Terminal, Underground shopping mall Co., Ltd.: KRW 150,000,000 for the Plaintiff and its related thereto from May 2, 2011.

1. The summary of the case is that the Plaintiff, who entered into a service contract for the basic design with the 1,3 merchants' association of the above shopping district in relation to the public invitation of the project implementer of the so-called "Gangnam Terminal Construction Project", was entitled to succeed to the Plaintiff's right to follow-up design, such as the shop design, if the 1,3 merchants' association of the above contract was decided as the project implementer, and the Defendant Gangnam-nam Terminal, Underground Terminal, Shopping Zone 2 (hereinafter "Defendant 2") decided as the project implementer succeeded to the status of the 1,3 merchants' association of the above basic design under the above service contract (hereinafter "Defendant corporation") in succession by the above Defendant Gangnam-nam Terminal, Inc., Ltd., which succeeded to the status of the project implementer by the above Defendant, and concluded a service contract for the shop design with another business entity through bidding without endeavoring to conclude the working design service contract with the Plaintiff is an infringement of the Plaintiff's right to preferential negotiations or expectation. In the first place against the Defendant corporation, it is the case of tort or default.

2. The Seoul Metropolitan Government Facilities Management Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Facilities Management Corporation”) that was entrusted with the management and operation of the project by the Seoul Metropolitan Government, the owner of the so-called “Gangnam Terminal Site” (hereinafter referred to as the “instant underground passage shop”) that was created on the underground of each road of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government distribution-dong 163-1 and 225 (hereinafter referred to as the “Seonam Terminal Site”), around 2009, announced that the project implementer will be selected by a public invitation on November 20, 209.

Accordingly, the first and third district merchants' associations and the second district merchants' associations decided to participate in the public invitation of each project implementer, while the first and third district merchants' associations are the Plaintiff and the third district merchants' associations on January 12, 2010.