logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2014.11.21 2014고단1379
폭행등
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 20, 2014, from around 23:30 to around 00:30 the following day, the Defendant expressed that the Defendant continued to engage in funeral services, on the ground that the victim D (the age of 28) who operates the said restaurant is click up on the road in front of the cafeteria, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter referred to as the “C”) restaurant, and that the victim resists the Defendant, on the ground that the victim’s complaint, the Defendant continued to click up the click up of the cafeteria, “I am click down because I am. I am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am am. I will am. I am. I am. I will am. I will am. I am. I will am. I will am. I will do. am......

Accordingly, the Enobian business owner, who is next to the above store, prevented the victim from entering the restaurant and the defendant, and the defendant saw the victim as a driver of the restaurant for about one hour, and sees the above restaurant by drinking the victim and talking it in a large amount of interest, and let the customer who was in the above restaurant become a member of the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's operation of the restaurant by force.

2. The Defendant causing property damage, at the same date and time as paragraph 1, and at the same place as the victim’s 112 report, was sent to the Defendant by the police, who was sent to the Defendant after having received the victim’s 112 report, to have the Defendant occupy the windline signboard, which is owned by the victim outside the above restaurant, due to the defect in the confirmation of the fact, and thereby, damaged the wind line signboard, which is owned by the victim, by removing it from the front door.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the statutes governing repair estimates;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow