A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Daegu District Court, and on September 9, 2010, issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a fine for the same crime from the Western Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court.

1. The defendant shall drive B Poter cargo vehicles in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

On November 8, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.151% with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.17% on November 17, 2018, and proceeded one lane of the four-lane roads in front of the Daegu Seo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, into the e-distance outflow of the e-mail basin from the cubic basin.

At the time of the defendant's running direction, the victim's E-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, was negligent by finding the said motor vehicle late later, and received the rear part of the said motor vehicle as the front part of the said cargo vehicle.

In the end, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was able to drive the said cargo normally due to the influence of drinking, such as fluoring, walking, walking, etc., and suffered an injury to the Defendant’s base and the tension, which requires a medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. Around November 17:17, 2018, the Defendant driven a Poter Cargo Vehicle B while under the influence of alcohol of about 0.151% in a section of about 1km from the front of G located in F of the Daegu Western-gu to the front of the Daegu Seo-gu Seoul Western-gu.

In this respect, even though the Defendant violated the regulations on prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, he also driven a car while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;