logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018. 05. 09. 선고 2017나67261 판결
사해행위 취소[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court-2016-Ban-536073 (24 May 2016)

Title

Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Summary

(1) The joint security against general creditors was reduced by a debtor in excess of his/her share of inheritance regarding the land of this case while holding a division agreement of this case. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the division agreement of this case constitutes a fraudulent act against other creditors.

The contents of the judgment are the same as the attachment.

Related statutes

Article 30 of the National Tax Collection Act

Cases

2017Na67261 Revocation of Fraudulent Act

Plaintiff

Korea

Defendant

L*** Country1

Conclusion of Pleadings

April 13, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

May 9, 2018

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim

As to the shares of 2/9 of the real estate Nos. 1 and 2 in the Schedule

A. The agreement on division of inherited property concluded on May 1, 2015 between Defendant AA and BB shall be revoked.

B. Defendant AAA shall implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the ground of restitution due to revocation of fraudulent act to BB.

2. As to shares in 2/9 out of 3 real estate listed in the separate list:

A. The agreement on division of inherited property concluded on May 1, 2015 between Defendant CCC and BB is revoked.

B. Defendant CCC shall implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on the ground of restitution due to revocation of fraudulent act to BB.

Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's reasoning for this case is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals by the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow