A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:00 on August 27, 2018, the Defendant: “A married husband is flurd with her husband; her husband is flurd with her husband; her husband is flurd with her husband, who received 112 report and received the demand from the police officers belonging to the Dong Police Station C district of the Dong Police Station called out to move out of the house, and “I am flurd with flurd with flurg, flurd with flurd with flurg, flurd with flurg, flurd with her chest at home, and flurd with E face to restrain this.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. Application of investigation reports (video images taken by a police officer accompanying a police officer), investigation reports (verification of cell phones images) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts (the point of each of the above crimes);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for one to five years;

2. Scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] of the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of duties (special sponsers): In cases where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is insignificant (the scope of the recommended area and the recommended sentence] mitigation area, and one month to eight months of imprisonment.

3. Determination of sentence: (a) together with the Defendant’s speech and behavior and the degree of violence at the time of the instant crime; (b) the police officers did not suffer serious injury due to the instant crime; (c) the Defendant did not have the same criminal record; and (d) the Defendant did not have the same criminal record; and (c) the Defendant determined the sentence as ordered and the execution of the sentence is suspended, by comprehensively taking account of all sentencing conditions as indicated in the arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character