1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 7, 1992, the Plaintiff’s husband’s (hereinafter “the deceased”) entered C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) and worked as the head of D branch from September 2005. On May 20, 2006, the Plaintiff was discharged from his superior on the ground that the branch’s business performance was low.

Accordingly, after having come to work on May 22, 2006, the deceased tried suicide and was diagnosed as having been diagnosed as having been known in detail in the ordinary university hospital on the same day.

B. The Deceased obtained approval from the Defendant for additional medical care during the period from May 22, 2006 to December 31, 2007 by using the name of the injury or disease as “major depression”. After the completion of the additional medical care, the Deceased received lump-sum disability compensation benefits by being recognized as class 12 Subparagraph 12 of the disability grade (the remaining person of the aftermath of the aftermath of the national part).

C. The Deceased retired from C on July 31, 2008.

On August 20, 2011, the Deceased was diagnosed as Ethical Ethical Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethician with no symptoms of mental illness, and was diagnosed as Ethical Ethic Ethic Ethic Ethician, and received outpatient drugs and counseling treatment from the above clinic until May 10, 2013.

E. On June 1, 2012, the Deceased started to operate a lodging facility for passengers using the Incheon Airport under the trade name, “Glest Systs” at the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Ftel during the treatment period as above.

F. On May 14, 2013, the Deceased died by falling on the instant officetel, and the direct deathist on the deceased’s body autopsy was indicated as “brupt suspension” and the intermediate cable exerciseer as “brupt death.”

G. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant committed suicide due to the recurrence of major depressions for which the deceased had already obtained approval for additional medical care, and claimed for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. However, on October 24, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that there was no proximate causal relation between the deceased’s first and the suicide of the deceased.

b.0.0 c.