1. The Defendant’s disposition of paying survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses to the Plaintiff on August 2, 2013 is revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Details of the disposition

On May 3, 2006, the deceased B(hereinafter referred to as the “the deceased”) was a co-born male and worked as a part-time lecturer at the Daejeon University.

The Defendant approved the deceased’s above cerebrovascular (hereinafter “the first cerebralcular”), the left-hand flady and the left-hand flady loss due to this (hereinafter “the disability caused by the first cerebralcular”), and approved the Defendant’s occupational accident as well as the first cerebral blood of this case.

From May 3, 2006 to July 31, 201, the Deceased received medical care benefits from the Defendant, and completed medical care on July 31, 201 and received disability benefits from the Defendant for the subsequent reasons.

On February 6, 2013, the Deceased, on board a bus, was sent back to the emergency room of the Soyang University Hospital. On the same day, the Deceased was diagnosed with brain room and brain-resistant cerebral hemal hemopsis (hereinafter “second cerebral hemopsis”), the right macy, and liveral (hereinafter “second cerebralopsis”) (hereinafter “the second cerebralopsis”).

On April 30, 2013, the Deceased applied for the instant secondary disease to the Defendant as an additional injury to the disease. However, on May 30, 2013, the Defendant rejected the instant secondary disease on the ground that there was no causal relationship between the recognition branch of the instant case and the two diseases.

After that, the Deceased died on June 18, 2013 when he/she received medical treatment at the Healthy University Hospital, Dental Care Hospital, and E Hospital.

A person who directly dies on the deceased’s death report prepared by the D convalescent hospital shall be entered into pulmonary blood, and the intermediate winner shall be entered into cerebral blood.

On July 25, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses on the ground that he/she died of a disease that occurred in connection with his/her duties. However, on August 2, 2013, the Defendant issued a bereaved family’s benefits and funeral expenses disposition against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute.