1. The Defendants jointly share 400,000 won to Plaintiff A and 5% per annum from October 9, 2018 to December 12, 2019.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. On October 8, 2018, at around 09:00 on October 8, 2018, Defendant H driven an I truck and was in the direction of the Busan Station at the entrance of the tunnel for modification. Defendant E also driving a J-si in the same view and working in the direction of the Busan Station at the entrance of the tunnel. In the road where four-lanes near the tunnel entrance are combined into two-lanes during the same direction, there was an accident leading to the left-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand side-hand side of the said cargo vehicle in the road section where the four-lanes near the tunnel entry is combined into the same direction. The traffic accident situation investigated by the investigative agency is as shown

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident.” Plaintiff A is a passenger boarding the back of the instant taxi at the time of the instant accident. Plaintiff B is the mother of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C is the male of Plaintiff A, Plaintiff C is the male partner of the Plaintiff, Defendant D organization is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with the said taxi. Defendant FF organization is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with the said taxi, and Defendant Limited Company G is the company to which the said cargo driver belongs.

Plaintiff

A was hospitalized in a hospital for 14 days on October 16, 2018 due to the climatic salt, tension, etc. A, and the Defendant FF organization guaranteed the Plaintiff’s medical expenses to the treatment hospital, while paying the Plaintiff’s medical expenses to the treatment hospital, the Defendant FF organization spent the amount equivalent to KRW 4,928,540 on the aggregate of the medical expenses, etc. until the lower police officer on February 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 7, Eul evidence 2 and 3 (including branch numbers), Eul evidence 1, Eul's video and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the accident in this case occurred due to the joint tort of the above taxi and cargo. Accordingly, Defendant E and H as a tort, Defendant D and F organization as a mutual aid business entity of the above vehicle, and Defendant D and F organization as the owner of the above cargo vehicle, and Defendant G as the owner of the above cargo vehicle, are jointly liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the accident in this case.