The part concerning plaintiffs A, B, and C in the judgment of the first instance shall be amended as follows:

The defendant shall set forth the plaintiff A in KRW 98,67,54.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) F is the G-si on December 29, 2016 (hereinafter “Defendant-Vehicle”) around 02:42 on December 29, 2016

) A H (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) that without permission crosses the road from the left side of the proceeding direction to the Defendant on the right side after passing through the intersection in accordance with green signals, while driving a three-lane road in the letter of the Jeju-do Gu tax moving Gu tax on the Gu tax on the Jeju-do along the road along the three-lanes from the North Northwest bank.

B) B shocked in three lanes (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) On January 3, 2017, the Deceased died of cerebral cerebral Bribery.) The Plaintiff’s wife, the Plaintiff’s children, the Plaintiff’s children, and the Plaintiff’s mother, and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply) to 3, 9, Eul evidence to 1, 2, and 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, since the accident of this case occurred due to F's violation of the duty of care in front of the week, the defendant, who is the mutual aid business operator of the defendant vehicle, has the duty to compensate the deceased and the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the accident

C. According to the above facts and the evidence mentioned above, Gap's evidence No. 10 to 12, and evidence No. 17, at the time of the defendant's vehicle, the operation speed of the defendant's vehicle exceeded 60km/h, and the F, the driver of the defendant's vehicle, was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for one year in the first instance trial related to the accident of this case.

However, the following facts and circumstances admitted by the evidence mentioned above, i.e., the time of the accident of this case was late at night, and the place where the accident of this case occurred is not above the crosswalk, but about about 10 meters away from the crosswalk which the defendant vehicle passed through the intersection in accordance with green signals, and it is four lanes.