Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 29, 2013, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of freight vehicles B, driven the above vehicle on April 17:3, 2013, and proceeded at a speed of about 82.5 km each hour from the direction of the mountain to the direction of the village center in Seosan-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seosan-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

Since there is a three-distance crossing from the right side of the left and the vehicle that intends to enter the right side of the vehicle, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident in advance by complying with the speed limit and driving safely by safely examining the front side.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the driver's left-hand turn on the right-hand side by the negligence of driving at a speed exceeding 20 km a speed of 20 km a speed, which the victim C (the age of 33) driven on the right-hand side of the freight vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from a serious injury to the victim, such as cerebral cerebral cerebral Enculsis damage, which requires less than 12 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Comprehensive traffic accident analysis replies;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of the counter party of the shootings);

1. Responses to requests for cooperation with investigation;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Report on investigation (C's judgment on serious injury);

1. On-site CCTV photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (CCTV image data analysis report);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the following circumstances on the grounds of sentencing) was to cause a traffic accident by excessively binding the Defendant, thereby causing 12 serious injury to the victim. The nature of the crime is not good.

On the other hand, however, the defendant agreed with the victim, the vehicle operated by the defendant has been covered by the motor vehicle comprehensive insurance, and the defendant has yet to be covered.