1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who is a victim C (math, 65 years old) and adjoining to the victim, was doubtful of the inhumanial relationship between D and his husband, and was not good between the victim and the victim.

On March 27, 2018, the Defendant suffered an injury to the victim, such as cutting down the upper part of the upper part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part, which did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the ground of appeal, as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

2. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

3. A copy of a medical certificate.

4. Application of the police investigation reporting Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

2. Grounds for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are to be confined in a workhouse.

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Fines of 50,000 to 10 million won; and

2. In this case, the decision of the sentence of sentence is that the defendant, who is the neighbor, was punished for a dispute with the neighbor, and caused an injury, such as by cutting down the upper part of the upper part of the 6 main diagnosis by cutting down the victim closely, and the nature of the crime and the criminal conduct are not good, and the degree of damage is also reasonable.

Due to the defendant's crime, the victim seems to have suffered considerable shock and pain as well as physical damage.

Nevertheless, the defendant does not compensate for damages to the victim or receive a letter of suspicion.

However, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent manner because he/she is doubtful of the inhumanity relationship between his/her husband and the victim, recognized his/her criminal act and committed the crime of this case, and appears to have taken the attitude of breaking his/her wrongness, and the victim seems to have been showing king, such as examining and walking stick due to the inconvenience of the bridge before the case, and the defendant appears to have suffered violence from the victim at the time of this case, and any criminal punishment is still imposed.