The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is the insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with D and E (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant A”) is the insurer who takes over the liability insurance with respect to F Two-wheeled Automobile (hereinafter “instant two-wheeled Automobile”) and the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) is the automobile insurance company with respect to G vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant 2”).

B. At around 09:30 on January 25, 2019, the Plaintiff’s vehicle runs along the mid-gu Cheongne-distance outflow from the lue-distance flood, and passed through the intersection by entering the lue-distance intersection with the lue-distance signal changed by yellow.

C. The instant two-wheeled vehicle is a signal signal atmosphere to enter the sexual o-distance intersection from the area of the o-distance distance.

Defendant 2’s vehicle is running along, and the vehicle that Plaintiff 2 is driving over the center line.

(I seem to have tried to cross the road through crosswalks that are facing the intersections).

Plaintiff

The vehicle, immediately after passing through the intersection, conflicts with the two-wheeled automobile of this case, which was going along the center line.

(hereinafter “instant accident”) e.

The Plaintiff paid a total of KRW 796,220 won to the Plaintiff’s driver’s hospital treatment expenses, etc.

[Grounds for recognition] Evidence Nos. 1 through 6, No. 1, 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The main argument of this case is that there was no causal relationship with the Plaintiff’s violation of signal signal at the Plaintiff’s intersection, and that the two-wheeled automobile involved in the central line was caused by the former negligence.

Therefore, Defendant 1 Company is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 796,220,00 paid for the medical expenses of the Plaintiff’s driver.

B. If the negligence of the Plaintiff’s vehicle is recognized in the occurrence of the instant conjunctive assertion, the signal sent prior to the Plaintiff’s vehicle.