beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a D-cub car. On April 24, 2014, the Defendant was driving the said car at around 11:20, and driving a one-lane road on which no median line is installed before the Chungcheongnam-gun E, Chungcheongnam-gun, and entered the intersection.
The location is a private-distance intersection without signal apparatus and without traffic control, where the width of the intersection is wider than that of the road through which the Defendant’s vehicle passes, and thus, when there are other vehicles seeking to enter the intersection from a road with a wide width, a person engaging in driving of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by driving the vehicle, by driving the vehicle along the intersection with the yield of the path from the road and considering the traffic situation at the right and right and right and right and right and right and right
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to enter the intersection from the road in which the victim F is wide in width, without yielding the course to enter the intersection, and thereby, was negligent in proceeding to enter the intersection as is, from the left side of the direction of the proceeding of the Defendant, to the right side part of the above Ortoo Science Industrial Complex, which passed through the intersection from the north side of the direction of the proceeding to the right side part of the vehicle front part of the Defendant.
The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim, such as mination of a light felinary executive in need of approximately 16 weeks of treatment, and caused the victim to suffer from the above injury, which caused the victim to suffer from the physical exercise of the right felination of a job, or the disease of a felin.
2. The instant facts charged constitute a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be punished against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning
Agreements, etc. attached to normal materials submitted by the defendant by his/her defense counsel.