logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.05.12 2016고단1184
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 50,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 25,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 27, 2016, the Defendant driven a e-mail at the private distance intersection in the vicinity of the D cafeteria, which is located in the Seoul metropolitan city around 11:10 on July 27, 2016, and continued to go straight from the surface of the ordinary elementary school at the site of the city-U.S. parks.

The driver of any motor vehicle who intends to drive a motor vehicle into an intersection where traffic is not controlled, shall slowly drive the motor vehicle, if the width of the intersection is wider than that of the road on which the motor vehicle is traveling, and when there is another motor vehicle who intends to drive a motor vehicle into the intersection from a road with a wide width, he/she shall yield the course

The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act by entering the intersection without yielding the course to the vehicles intending to drive slowly or enter the intersection, even though the area was an intersection, such as a signal where traffic is not controlled, and the width of the intersection was wider than that of the road where the Defendant is passing.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each traffic accident report and response to a request for appraisal;

1. Application of CCTV photographs and CCTV video-related Acts and subordinate statutes to accidents;

1. Article 26 of the relevant Act and Articles 26 (6) and 156 of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that when the defendant runs slowly through the intersection and is going out after passing through the center of the intersection, it depends on the upper left side of the defendant's vehicle and the left side of the defendant's vehicle. Rather, the defendant has to yield the course to the defendant's vehicle which had already been passing through the intersection, and therefore the defendant has violated road traffic laws.

shall not be deemed to exist.

2. Determination

A. Article 25(6) of the Road Traffic Act is in violation of Article 25(6) of the Road Traffic Act and Article 25(6) of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow