A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 12, 2015, around 21:00, the Defendant ordered two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two weeks of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capitals of two capital

However, the defendant was not in possession of money at the time and did not have the intent and ability to pay the money even if he was provided with alcohol and speech from the victim.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received delivery of 430,000 won from the victim as well as 4.3 billion won.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 2015. 3. 12. 22:20경 위 E 주점에서 제1항과 같이 피고인이 술값을 주지 않고 소란을 피운다는 내용의 112 신고를 받고 출동한 창원중부경찰서 F지구대 소속 경찰관 G로부터 “술값을 지급하고 귀가하라”는 말을 듣자, 상스러운 욕설을 하면서 주먹을 휘둘러 경찰관의 얼굴을 1회 때리고, 발로 배 부분을 1회 찼다.

As above, the Defendant assaulted a police officer to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning handling reports 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on invoices and business registration certificates;

1. Relevant Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders was finalized on October 31, 2014 by having been sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for the crime of injury in the branch court of the Daegu District Court, which was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence on August 31, 2014, and committed the instant crime during the suspended sentence period, and there is a need to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in order to establish the state’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority. However, the Defendant’s mistake is against himself/herself and the victim of