A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 2860"

1. On March 31, 2019, at the main point of “D” managed by the victim C (year 31) located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on March 31, 2019, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, although the Defendant was unable to pay the drinking value, he/she was in possession of only the check card connected with the account remaining outside of 14,000 won, he/she did not have the ability and intent to pay the drinking value.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained economic benefits equivalent to KRW 440,000 in total from the market price by being provided with entertainment services equivalent to KRW 140,00 in the two major market prices of KRW 150,000 in the two major market prices and two major market prices of KRW 150,000.

2. On March 31, 2019, at around 06:25, the Defendant: (a) reported at the place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, that “no son drink drink drink drink drink,” and sought from G to pay the drinking value from the police officer F and policeman belonging to the Seoul Gwanak Police Station E-gu, Seoul, which called the “F and the police officer called out,” and (b) expressed the desire to “I will grow off on two occasions, I would like to walk on the bridge of the said G,” and “I would like to walk on the bridge of the said G,” and assault the face of the said F at one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of reported telephone cases.

"2019 Highest 3469"

1. On April 1, 2019, the criminal defendant against the victim H showed the same attitude that the victim H(37 years of age) would normally pay the alcohol value at the main point of "J" operated by Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, and ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol.

However, the Defendant did not have any means of payment such as cash or credit card, and thus did not have any intent or ability to pay the drinking value even if he was provided with alcoholic beverages and know-how.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is the sum of market prices from the victim.