1. The Defendant from April 9, 201, to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the Appointeds B, respectively, as well as to each of the said amounts.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a company that aims at the financial investment business, such as trust business, and the plaintiff (the appointed party; hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff") and the designated party B (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff, etc.") who are the plaintiff's wife and the designated party B (hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiff, etc.") are investors of the defendant.

B. On October 8, 2010, the Plaintiff, etc. entered into a specified money trust agreement (hereinafter “each of the instant trust agreements”) with Defendant C branch employees and paid KRW 100,000,000 each of the money trusted by the Plaintiff, etc. to the corporate commercial paper (hereinafter “corporate commercial paper”) issued by LIG Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “LIG construction”). On the same day, the Plaintiff, etc. entered into a specified money trust agreement with Defendant C branch employees and paid KRW 100,000,000 to the Defendant on the same day.

According to each of the instant trust deeds, each of the trust deeds is from October 8, 2010 to April 8, 2011. The rate of return on the instant corporate bills is 8.40% per annum (7.40% after remuneration), and the beneficiary of trust principal and trust interest is the Plaintiff, etc.

C. On March 21, 2011, the Seoul Central District Court applied for the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings for the construction of LIG on March 21, 201, and the decision on commencement of rehabilitation proceedings was rendered on April 1, 201.

After that, on September 30, 2011, the rehabilitation plan of LIG was issued on September 30, 201, and 20% of the principal amount was converted into equity and 30% of the principal amount was paid in cash with respect to corporate bills, but the amount to be paid in cash shall be paid in equal installments each year for nine years from the second year (2013) to the tenth year (2021) after the first year (2012) and 50% of the principal amount was issued as corporate bonds in 201 and substituted for the repayment of rehabilitation claims.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 18, Eul evidence 1 and 14 (including partial number of evidence, hereinafter the same), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff.