beta
Text
1. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the decision of the first instance, including the plaintiffs' claims extended in the trial, are as follows.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is a company aimed at providing financial investment services, such as trust business, and the plaintiffs are investors of the defendant who entered into a specified money trust contract with the defendant as follows:
B. On October 15, 2010, upon the recommendation of the head of the department E of Defendant D Branch, C entered into a specified money trust agreement with the Defendant to operate the money trusted by the Plaintiff A on behalf of the Plaintiff A (hereinafter “LIG construction”) for corporate commercial paper (hereinafter “corporate commercial paper”) with the face value of 200,000,000, and maturity of 15 April 201, 201, and paid KRW 200,000,000 to the Defendant on the same day.
(2) On November 12, 2010, upon the recommendation of the head of the department E at Defendant D Branch, C entered into a specified money trust agreement with the Defendant on behalf of the Plaintiff B (hereinafter the above two contracts are referred to as “each of the instant trust agreements”; and on the same day, the Defendant paid KRW 100,000,000 to the Defendant on the same day, which provides that the amount trusted by the Plaintiff B shall be operated on corporate commercial paper with the face value of KRW 100,000,000 issued by LIG construction, and the maturity of May 13, 2011.
(3) According to each of the instant trust contracts, the trust period is from the date of each contract to the due date, the return rate is 8.4% per annum, and the beneficiaries of trust principal and trust interest are the Plaintiffs.
(4) Meanwhile, according to each of the instant trust deeds, the Plaintiffs, investors, invest only the amount obtained by deducting profits from the face value of the instant corporate commercial paper, and receive the face value of the instant corporate commercial paper at maturity. As such, the amount obtained by deducting profits from the face value of the instant corporate commercial paper becomes the purchase value of the instant corporate commercial paper.
Therefore, the full amount paid by the plaintiffs to the defendant is.