logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2012.07.04 2011고단560 (1)
업무상횡령등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, and imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B From September 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010, from August 1, 2010 to the above school principal, Defendant A has overall control over the overall operation of the school, such as accounting and finance, and Defendant A has been engaged in the accounting and finance of the school as the head of the above school administration office from January 1, 2003.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On January 26, 2010, the Defendants received 22,00,000,000 won from the office of education of Jeonnam-do as local competition reserve funds, and received 80,883,360 won as financial defective subsidies from the office of education of Jeonnam-do, for the victim’s educational foundation H. In fact, although the Defendants did not purchase the practical training materials, they prepared a false payment resolution and approved the Defendants as if they purchased the technical training materials from the I, even though they did not have purchased the technical training materials, as if they were to purchase the CNC/C and the functional training materials of the vehicle, and then remitted the amount of KRW 42,230,00 to the Agricultural Cooperative account under the name of the I representative J on February 26, 2010, and then arbitrarily used them after receiving 38,380,000 won excluding value-added tax amount from the said J in cash.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and embezzled 42,230,000 won.

B. From February 2009 to October 2010, the Defendants collected KRW 44,900,000 as the expenses for the special guidance and practice against the students of parents in the technical field adjoining G high schools, from the parents in the technical field in the technical field to collect KRW 44,90,00 under the pretext of the special guidance and practice in preparation against the participation in the technical field, and then arbitrarily used the amount of KRW 3,00,000 on October 9, 2009 as if the victims paid the purchase price for the experimental and practice materials for the victim’s educational foundation.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and embezzled 18,600,000 won.

2. When Defendant A was investigated by the prosecution due to the same crime as set forth in paragraph (1), Defendant A’s sole criminal act shall repay the amount embezzled to cover the construction cost of the Multi-Purpose Party newly built in 2005.

arrow