beta
Text
1. It shall be confirmed that each real estate listed in the separate sheet is owned by the plaintiff;
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The land B before subdivision was transferred to “I” through the name of D, E, F, G, and the name of H from C, who is the name of the circumstance. B B before subdivision, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).
(C) After being divided into two parts, “I” recorded as the owner of each land cadastre above as the Plaintiff’s co-owner of each of the above land cadastre in this case remains unregistered until now. There is no dispute between the parties. Although “I” written on October 8, 1946 that “I” acquired ownership, there is no other indication in the address or resident registration number, etc. of the above I. Meanwhile, “I” died on June 27, 1952, and was deceased on the deceased on June 27, 1952, and the Plaintiff’s father- He succeeded to I. The deceased on July 31, 2007, and his wife K died on June 17, 2005, the deceased on June 17, 2005, and the deceased on the deceased on the ground that “I” did not have any dispute over the Plaintiff, the heir of the deceased on the title “I” (the former) and “I” or “I” on each of the instant inherited property, the purport that I did not dispute over the inheritance or division, the purport of the Plaintiff’s agreement.
2. Determination on this safety defense
A. “I”, the owner of each real estate of this case, is the same as “The Network I” and “I” of the Plaintiff’s protocol.
Meanwhile, even though each of the instant real estate is unregistered and the address of “I” is not indicated in its land cadastre, “I” as an owner is also indicated in the land cadastre of 522 square meters in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, the adjacent land, as well as the Plaintiff’s protocol, and its address is indicated as “X-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.”
In light of this, each of the real estate in this case, which is the land above and adjacent thereto, is not known to the registrant on the land cadastre, but is not the defendant.