Text
1. The Defendants connect the Plaintiff with each point of “1, 2, 3, 4, and 1” indicated in the annexed drawings among Pyeongtaek-si D.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the 378m2, Dong-dong 378m2, Dong-dong 378m2 (hereinafter “instant real estate”), and the Defendants are the married couple.
B. On April 7, 2015, the Plaintiff paid the Defendants a deposit of KRW 15,00,000 for the instant real estate, and monthly rent of KRW 1,250,000 (Additional Tax Table) on the 10th day of each month, and entered into a real estate lease agreement with the term of lease from April 10, 2015 to April 10, 2017 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and delivered the said real estate to the Defendants on April 10, 2015.
C. The Defendants did not pay the said lease deposit to the Plaintiff, and are currently using and benefiting from the instant real estate, which is the leased object, and are the unpaid amount of KRW 14,500,000 as of May 2018.
On March 23, 2018, the Plaintiff expressed to the Defendants a wish to terminate the instant lease agreement on the grounds of more than two strings, and filed a claim against the Defendants for the delivery of the instant real estate.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings
2. The instant lease agreement was terminated on the ground of the Defendants’ delay of rent, barring special circumstances.
Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to order the Plaintiff to use the instant real estate, and to pay the unpaid rent of KRW 14,500,000 and the unpaid rent of KRW 14,500 from June 10, 2018 to June 10, 2018 in proportion to the monthly rent of KRW 1,250,000.
3. The plaintiff's request for the conclusion is reasonable.