1. The Defendants are to the Plaintiff.

(a) Of the first floor of the real estate listed in the separate sheet, each of the indications 1, 2, 7, 8, and 1 of the annexed sheet.

1. According to the purport of Gap evidence No. 1 and all pleadings as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendants on July 31, 2013, stating that the lease agreement was concluded between the Defendants, in sequence 1, 2, 7, 8, and 1 among the 1st floor of the real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff, with a size of KRW 23.14 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “instant real estate”) and KRW 5 million in the lease deposit, monthly rent of KRW 500,000,000 in the lease deposit, and the lease period from July 30, 2013 to July 29, 2015 (the above lease agreement is renewed upon the expiration of the previous lease agreement). The Defendants did not pay the Defendants a total of KRW 200,000 after the expiration of the lease agreement for a long time from May 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014.

According to the above facts, since the above lease agreement was terminated by the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention to terminate the contract for the reason that the two or more rental companies of the Defendants were terminated, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff, and to pay the amount calculated by the rate of KRW 2 million in total from September 1, 2014 to September 31, 2014 and KRW 500,000 in total from September 1, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of the instant real estate.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted.