Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2014 Highest 616"
1. From July 2010 to August 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim in Eda operated by the victim D during his/her stay at the time of Eda from July 2010 to August 2010, stating, “The victim shall have his/her clothes taken away and have money needed. If the value of clothes is given instead of the value of clothes, the Defendant will have to complete the clothes with his/her work extremely highly.”
However, in fact, the Defendant paid off the credit card-related debt amounting to KRW 5 million and became a bad credit holder, and there was no other active property, and even if the Defendant used most of the money for living expenses, entertainment expenses, etc. to pay the value of clothes, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay it to the victim.
The defendant had the victim pay 1 million won in lieu of the clothes value around that time, thereby acquiring property profits equivalent to the same amount.
2. On October 2010, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) to a police officer at early October 2010, by deceiving the victim and allowing him to settle the amount of KRW 80,000,000 with the computer value instead of the said method.
3. On October 2010, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim from the places indicated in the above paragraph (1) at the places indicated in the above paragraph (1) and by allowing the settlement of the amount of KRW 400,000 in lieu of the cosmetics value; and (b) acquired
4. On October 2010, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing Paragraph (1) at the end of the end of October, 2010, by deceiving the victim and allowing him to settle the amount of two million won in lieu of the clothes value, thereby acquiring pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.
5. On Nov. 1, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the Gda Center operated by the above victim, who is located in F at the beginning of November 2010, stating that “The victim ought to have a 400,000 won to have a son-gu talked with it.”
However, in fact, the economic situation of the defendant was the same as the above Paragraph 1, and it was not thought that the defendant continued to work, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, the defendant will pay it.