logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.05.29 2013고정1191
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2013, around 10:10, the Defendants entered the fact that the 6th floor E company of the Ma building in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Mangyang-si was located, and Defendant A referred to the victim F (the 50 years of age) who had reported his business at the same time as “I are in the company,” and used the victim’s head collection to be shakened, and Defendant B attached both arms on the rear side of the victim and had the victim go beyond the office floor of the office.

As a result, the Defendants jointly damaged the victim F in 2000, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the second protocol of trial;

1. The legal statement of the witness F (as to the defendant B)

1. Statement made by the witness F in the third protocol of the trial (for the defendant A),

1. The CD screen;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. The Defendants: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion on the assertion of Defendant B and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are denied to the effect that Defendant B and the defense counsel did not make the victim go beyond the part of the victim.

In light of the following facts: (a) according to the evidence in the judgment of the court below, Defendant B, as described in the judgment of the court below, was found to have put both arms on the rear side of the victim and damaged the victim; (b) Defendant B, recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, entered the facts of the victim together with Defendant A; (c) the process and form of the victim’s entry into the victim; (d) the process and situation of the victim’s entry into the victim; and (e) the victim’s statement; and (e) the victim’s damage statement, Defendant B toldd the victim.

In addition, the defendant A and the victim are tangible.

arrow