beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.
Reasons
Criminal facts
"2012 Gohap241"
1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) was the former project executor of the F District Land Partitioning Association (hereinafter “instant association”), and was not in the position of creditors with claims of KRW 2,876,887,920 against the instant association, and lost the status of trustee and trustee of the instant association’s right to implement the instant association’s business on April 23, 2002, while he was found to be the above trustee and trustee of the instant association’s right to implement the instant association on June 30, 2010 after he was appointed to G as the head of the association on June 30, 2010 and on October 20, 2010, he had G enter the said land as the owner of the land allotted by the development recompense for development recompense for development outlay (hereinafter “H development recompense”) in the name of the existing owner of the land allotted by the development recompense for development recompense for development outlay for development outlay for the development outlay for development outlay for the same purpose.
After that, the Defendant asserted that I was the owner of the land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay on December 31, 2009 and that I filed a lawsuit claiming the payment of land usage fees against KK stock company as of December 31, 2009, but was aware of the progress of the lawsuit, the Defendant was willing to sell the said land secured by the authorities in recompense for development outlay and sell the sale price to L who operates the hospital in recompense for development outlay and acquire the sale price for his
Thus, around February 1, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “H development recompense land is owned by the instant association, which does not correspond to the ownership of the owner of the instant association as the trustee of the right to implement the instant association’s business, and that it can be disposed of domestically and domestically, so the Defendant purchased the land allotted by the authorities in recompense for development outlay.” The acquisition of ownership is no problem.
However, the facts are as follows: H. H. I.