1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the following is added to the text of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, the Plaintiff’s father added the following to the fourth part of the first instance judgment, “not to ..........” and the Plaintiff’s father merely merely worked as a staff member of the PDP party, and there was no political activity. Therefore, it is difficult to believe the Plaintiff’s assertion as it is, since there is no reasonable ground to kill the Plaintiff on the part of the APC party.

제1심판결문 제4면 제8행 아래에 다음의 내용을 추가함 (다) 아울러 원고는 나이지리아의 취약국가지수가 매우 높고 나이지리아 내 종족집단의 텃세가 심해 공권력에 의한 보호를 기대하거나 나이지리아 내 타 지역으로의 이주가 어려운 상황이라고 주장한다.

However, even though the government's measures on the domestic security issues of Austria are somewhat insufficient, each statement of evidence Nos. 4, 5, and 6 alone does not seem to have reached a degree that it is difficult to resolve the problem through the protection of the Austrian government or alternative migration to other regions in the Republic of Korea under the circumstances as alleged by the plaintiff, and the above assertion is without merit, since there is no other evidence to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.