1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following additional parts, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added to the fourth decision of the first instance.

The plaintiff asserts that "(the plaintiff is the weak State Index of 2019) accounts for the 14th of the world around the 98.5th of the world, which is remarkably higher (the 92.7.7. and 26th of the world) than North Korea (the evidence No. 6-1, 23 of the evidence No. 6-1, 26), and published by the International Amnesty Commission, it is stated that there is no protection expectation from the police of its country, and that the police is close to the existence of threat to the safety of the people (the evidence No. 7-1, 2 of the evidence No. 7-2 of the evidence No. 7), and it is difficult to view that the plaintiff can escape from gambling by using the Agen Justice system or transmitting it to another region.

However, even if considering the contents of the above relevant data, only the plaintiff's assertion or the materials submitted by the plaintiff cannot request the protection of Maria federal or state judicial authorities in the case of the plaintiff.

We cannot accept the Plaintiff’s assertion that it is difficult to resolve the problem through alternative migration to another region.

A person shall be appointed.

2. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case is dismissed for lack of grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.