logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.09.24 2015고단1189
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a rocketing taxi driver.

On December 13, 2014, around 04:17, the Defendant: (a) laid the victim D (V, 30 years of age) in the Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government as the customers of the said taxi; (b) arrived at the alleyway of the victim in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul on December 13, 2014; (c) requested two times the victim to pay two times the taxi fee; (d) the victim attempted to pay by credit card due to the shortage of cash, but the Defendant refused to pay it in cash.

The defendant brought the victim's cash in his house, and the defendant could not believe the defect in the above taxi, and said the victim's bank was placed in the back seat of the above taxi, and the victim entered the house to bring his bank on cash in the above seat of the above taxi. The victim entered the house to bring his bank on the back seat of the above taxi according to the defendant's horse.

The Defendant used the gap in the victim's house, carried 10,00 won in cash, 1 card, 1 driver's license, 1 galleno-4 mobile phone with the market value of one million won in white galle-rithothothothothm, 1 galle-rithm, 1 galle-rithm, 40,000 won in market value, 1,50,000 won in market value, and 1,80,000,000 won in market value.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A report on investigation (verification of CCTV for crime prevention);

1. The investigation report (the confirmation of the operator, the operator, and the driver who is counterpart to the commercial air traffic);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation report (date of change of mobilephone devices and confirmation of the re-issuance of damaged goods);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the Defendant and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel shall be asserted.

arrow