Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum of two years and six months, and a short of two years.

Sexual assault for 40 hours against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants and G, and H considered that the victim I (the age of 14) was interested in and approaching the Defendant A’s male-friendly appearance H in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special quasi-rape) and the victim was willing to engage in sexual intercourse after having the victim drink with the victim and drink the victim.

around November 4, 2012, the Defendants, G, and H led the victim to continue drinking together with the victim, and led the victim to continue drinking. Ultimately, the victim was under the influence of alcohol and was locked.

Accordingly, Defendant A and H referred to Defendant C as “Nat first, as soon as possible,” and Defendant C included the fingers in the negative part of the victim who is actually and actually enjoyed.

At the same time, there was a brutal flusium posted on the tables.

After subtracting from the former, the former has engaged in sexual intercourse once by inserting his own sexual organ on the back of the victim's sexual flag, and inserting his sexual organ on the back of the victim's sexual flag.

According to the evidence admitted as evidence of guilt when Defendant A and H continued to mean that Defendant B “Nhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,” and Defendant B “hhhhhhhhhhhhh,” the following evidence revealed that Defendant A, after having sexual intercourse with the victim with Defendant C, had expressed that Defendant B would have sexual intercourse with the victim once again with H, but it is recognized that Defendant B would have sexual intercourse with the victim. However, according to Defendant B’s statement at the investigative agency of Defendant B (the investigation record 567,601 pages), unlike the facts charged in the indictment, the phrase “hhhhhhhh, without any opportunity to have sexual intercourse. It is difficult to view that the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone proves that the part of the facts charged that Defendant A made such speech together with H was proven without any reasonable doubt.”