1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the costs of supplementary participation, are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

In the fourth 6-7th 6th 7th 7th 2015, “The present case is continuing to be Supreme Court Decision 2012Du15647 Decided January 15, 2015,” the Supreme Court appealed to this effect that “The plaintiffs appealed to Supreme Court Decision 2012Du15647 Decided January 15, 2015, which became final and conclusive by dismissing the plaintiffs’ final appeal.”

“A” shall be added to “The grounds for recognition” of heading 6-7.

Following the second sentence of the second sentence, “I have the standing to sue” (see Supreme Court Decision 2014Du4917, May 29, 2014).

From the last day of the 8th parallel to the 9th parallel, the phrase “limited” in the 1st parallel to the word “restricted.”

The following is added to the statement in Section 10 of the 13th page “(s) to the effect that it can be recognized that the above recognition has been dismissed,” only by the statement in Section 68 to 73 of the A, and the statement in Section 75 to 88 of the A (including the number) submitted by the Appellate Court.

2. The judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the name of the defendant 1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "School Court J" in the name of the defendant 1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error in the