logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.08.21 2018고단570
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 570] On May 25, 2018, the Defendant driven a vehicle with approximately 200 meters alcohol level 0.114% while under the influence of alcohol level 0.114% in the direction of the road in front of the “St 24.0 convenience store” located in 20 Mat 138, Mat 138, Mat 200, Mat 138, Mat 88.

[2018 Height 638] No person may transfer or acquire access media in using or managing access media.

Around September 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person who introduces himself/herself as C to “to offer KRW 300,000 per week to B of a corporate passbook; and (b) accordingly, established D companies with limited liability (business registration number E) around October 2016; (c) opened an account in the name of the said company at a new bank located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government branch; and (d) transferred cash cards, OTP, cash cards connected to the said account at the front of Busan Metropolitan City, and OTP to Kwikset services.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media to another person.

[2018 Height 661] No person may transfer or acquire access media in using or managing access media.

Around September 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person who introduces himself/herself as C to “to offer KRW 300,000 per week to B of a corporate passbook; and (b) accordingly, established H (business registration number: I and the current J) of a limited company around December 2016; (c) opened an account in the name of the said company at the location of the 281-13, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, at the location of the 281-13, and transferred the said name to B of the said company by means of cash card, the OTP issued at KRW 30,000,000 after receiving the said cash card, the OTP, etc. on the front of the 20-dong branch of the Bank.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the access media to another person.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 Highest 570]

arrow