1. The defendant

A. Of the area of 92.80 square meters which is one-story of the ground mentlubos and lux roof, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group C.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as well as the arguments, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on November 21, 201 with respect to the lease deposit amount of KRW 2,00,000, monthly rent of KRW 150,000 (payment on April 12, 201) and KRW 3,350,000 for the lease deposit and rent of KRW 1,2,300 for the lease deposit and rent of KRW 1,350 for the lease deposit and rent of KRW 50,00 for the lease deposit and rent of KRW 1,30 for the lease deposit and rent of KRW 1,30 for the lease of KRW 50 for the lease of KRW 1,30 for the lease of KRW 50,500 for the lease of KRW 1,50 for the lease of KRW 200,000 for the lease of KRW 5,300 for the lease of KRW 5,5000 for the lease of KRW 1.5.

According to the above facts, the above lease contract was terminated by the plaintiff's declaration of termination due to the defendant's failure to pay two or more rents, and the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff as restitution to the original state, and pay the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 150,000 per month from August 21, 2012 to the completion date of delivery of the building of this case from August 21, 2012 to the date of delivery of the building of this case, after the plaintiff was paid the rent from the defendant as a return of

B. As to this, the Defendant asserted that the lease deposit was set at KRW 3,00,000 and KRW 150,000 per month under the above lease agreement, and that the Defendant paid all the above lease deposit and the rent to the Plaintiff by December 2, 2014, but there is no evidence to acknowledge this, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.