beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 20,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Criminal facts
【Criminal Power】 On November 30, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 500,000,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Daegu District Court on November 30, 2006, and one million,00,000,000,000,000,000 for the same crime.
【Criminal Administration” around 12:05 on February 6, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven an Eystren vehicle while drunk alcohol concentration of about 0.219% at a section of about 600 meters from the front of the road located in the Southern-gu B to the D apartment parking lot; and (b) violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement concerning F;
1. Police seizure records;
1. Reports on the occurrence of a traffic accident, photographs of the scene of the accident, reports on the results of the drinking driving control, reports on the state of drinking driving, reports on the state of drinking drivers, meetings for appraisal request, reports on actual condition survey, and estimates;
1. Each report on investigation;
1. A previous conviction: A written inquiry report and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the same kind of crime;
1. Relevant laws concerning criminal facts, Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose a penalty, and selection of fines;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is extremely high, and the 3rd drinking driving is the third drinking driving, and the occurrence of traffic accidents involving other vehicles occurs while driving under drinking (this part is not prosecuted by agreement with the victim). However, the 2nd drinking driving is somewhat at intervals with time other than the criminal records in the judgment, and there is no penal power other than the criminal records in the judgment, and the defendant reflects his mistake in depth. In addition, the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, workplace life, etc. are also considered, and the punishment is determined as indicated in the order.