logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.01.15 2017나2039083
위자료 약정금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance is not different from the evidence submitted by the court of first instance, and the evidence submitted by the court of first instance is different from the evidence submitted by the

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.

[Supplementary or additional parts] The 2nd 6th 6th son of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be the Defendant “Defendant B (Death on July 17, 2017, hereinafter “the deceased”) before the filing of the lawsuit.”

Each "Defendant", which is between the two pages 8 through 7 pages 16 (except for 17 pages 3) of the judgment of the first instance, shall be raised to "the deceased".

Each “C” between 2.6 and 7.9 pages of the judgment of the first instance shall be “Defendant C”, each “D” shall be “Defendant D”, and each “F” shall be “Defendant F”.

The 3rd judgment of the first instance court and the 17th judgment "the defendant" shall be applied to "the defendant".

Each “for the deceased’s heir, as the deceased’s heir, is obligated to pay KRW 214,285,714, Defendant D, and F, respectively, 142,857,142 won and damages for delay.”

The following shall be added to the two last sentence of the first instance judgment:

【The Deceased died on July 17, 2017, after the first instance judgment was rendered, and the Defendant C, the wife, inherited the deceased’s property 2/7 each by Defendant D and F, the wife, 3/7, and 2/7.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow