logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.06.21 2016고정196
업무방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the believers of the G religious organization “H” located in Sam-si F.

The injured party J Co., Ltd. and the injured party K K Co., Ltd., the contractor of the national road section I of the national road section I ordered by the original state-owned land management agency, failed to smoothly perform the construction work because the compensation problem for the adjoining land of the above H was not resolved. On December 31, 2016, the date of completion, which was the date of completion, tried to perform the construction work by mobilization of equipment, such as scrails, employees, and daily workers to install access roads for the construction work at the entrance of the above “H” from February 23, 2016.

The Defendants, as the believers of “H”, had the mind to interfere with the public intention of building access roads to the above victims by force.

Defendants: (a) around 09:00 on March 3, 2016, at the construction site for the construction of construction works and access roads to the above victims; (b) at the construction site for securing access roads; and (c) at the construction site for construction with approximately 40 believerss, Defendant A: (a) putting one hand with portable microphones and sound “each construction work after agreement is reached on both sides”; (b) Sheed in front of the current construction site; (c) Defendant B tried to ask the victims of the given plastic paper that he had prepared in advance, or she did so in front of the back of the construction site; (d) Defendant C her seated or did not take part in the front of the construction site by taking part in the plastic paper at the construction site; and (e) Defendant C she did not take part in the plastic paper at the construction site; and (e) she did not take part in the front of the construction site at the construction site; and (e) Defendant C she did so.

As above, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the victims’ road construction work by force.

(i) the evidence;

arrow