Text
1. The defendant Hanjin Industries Co., Ltd. is the plaintiff Gap 129,904,297 won, and the plaintiff Eul 3,000,000 won and each of the above amounts.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff A, with the trade name of “C”, performed the work of processing presses from the Defendant Hanjin Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hanjin Heavy Industries”) under a subcontract for the work of processing vessel blocks and painting.
B. On August 10, 2015, Plaintiff A: (a) around 18:45, around 18:65, 2015, boarded Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (b) carried out a ship’s painting work, which was contracted from Defendant Han Jin Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant vehicle”); and (c) was killed, such as a booming booming boom at both sides of the instant vehicle by falling with a boomet on the wind to the wind (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (d) at the time of the accident, the boom boom boom booms at the time of the accident and at the scene of the accident are as follows:
C. The instant vehicle was registered and managed as the 6th vehicle for the Defendant Han Jin Heavy Industries, by installing a boom boom and boomet so that workers may board and work at a high place in that boomet.
Plaintiff
B is the wife of Plaintiff A.
[Ground of Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 4, Gap evidence 5-1 through 5, Gap evidence 6, 7, 12, 13, 14, Eul evidence 1, 2, 8, Eul evidence 11-1 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiffs' damages claim against the defendants
A. 1) As seen in the above basic facts, the accident of this case, as seen in the above basic facts, is caused by the wind that the boom boom cost installed in the above vehicle during the Plaintiff’s ordinary use of the vehicle of this case. Thus, it can be deemed that it was caused by the defect in the installation and management of the boom boom set up in the vehicle of this case. Meanwhile, the Defendant Han Jin Heavy Industries is seen as this.