Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 20, 2009, the Defendant was notified of the decision to commence a compulsory auction by the Suwon District Court for the above real estate on April 20, 2009, the Defendant: (a) entered into a false lease agreement with E and F, his own seat, stating that “the Defendant leases the above CDara 403 on March 30, 200 to F, KRW 18 million; (b) made a false lease agreement with F, stating that “The Defendant leases the above CDara 403 on March 30, 2008, to F, KRW 403 million; and (c) made a public offering to divide the dividend to be received by the victim by deceiving the court by submitting the above lease agreement to the court.
Based on the above public offering, in the H office operated by the defendant, E, and F in the G located in the G located in the G located in the G located in the G located in the Gyeonggi-gu Gyeonggi-si, 200, the defendant was paid 18 million won from F to the above C lending 403, and the defendant did not lease the above C lending 403 to F, "The above C lending 403 million won is leased to F on March 30, 2008," and thereafter the defendant submitted the above lease contract to an employee whose name is not known at the time of the execution of the Ansan-gu branch of the Suwon-gu District Court's Ansan branch.
Accordingly, on December 29, 2009, the defendant, E, and F had the defendant prepare a dividend list to distribute the amount of KRW 14 million and KRW 422,551 in the order of priority.
Around January 4, 2010, F continued to have been tried by the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund by filing a lawsuit of objection against the dividend table, however, the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund called the J, an employee of the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund, an employee of the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund, for several times at that time, “I would find dividends.” On March 19, 2010, by filing an application for dividend payment, and by receiving dividends of KRW 14,422,550.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Protocols concerning the interrogation of suspects of E by the prosecution (part of the statement of the defendant);