The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The first instance judgment is the purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and the same applies to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition as follows. Thus, this is included in the summary by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part of the judgment of the first instance, which was written or added, added “a judgment” after the Supreme Court Decision 91Da23707 Decided May 12, 1992, is added.

From the 15th parallel to the 11th parallel of the judgment of the first instance, “each of the evidence mentioned above either to the 10th parallel of the 19th parallel of the 10th parallel of the judgment” is as follows.

As a result of the entrustment of the appraisal of the medical records to the head of the F Hospital at the above evidence and the F Hospital at the first instance court, the results of this court's request for the appraisal of the medical records to the head of G hospital at this court, the results of inquiries into the facts of the first instance court and the head of the F Hospital at this court, and the following circumstances acknowledged by the overall purport of the transition theory: ① The method of treatment of spine brate circhosis exists in the method of surgery, such as medication and physical therapy, in addition to the surgery, and the method of surgery and the method of surgery blocking; the surgery is considered when the surgery is not resolved by an inception, and the surgery is considered first in the treatment of spine circhosis cirrosis cirrosis cirrosis cirrosis cirrosis cirrosis 4 in the case of surgery; ② the results of the clinical analysis and the results of the plaintiff's symptoms before the first operation need to be implemented at least 4-5 times in the right side of the surgery.

It does not seem, 3. It was performed again in the same place before the body of the operation was performed.

Even if it is not directly related to the increase in the risk of infection, it is due to the implementation of the second surgery even if the defendant's family is about the second surgery by creating a wrong range of surgery.