logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.04.02 2018가단5006733
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant School Foundation G (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) is the operator of H Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) and the employer of the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant F is the dental specialist affiliated with the Defendant Hospital.

B. On September 7, 2016, I complained of the Defendant Hospital that it cannot walk up to 10 meters from the lusium and mass pain.

Accordingly, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital judged the symptoms as inverte inverte in which the symptoms are not resolved by an inception method and decided to provide a surgical treatment.

C. On September 18, 2016, Defendant F confirmed that he/she had conducted the spine MRI inspection with respect to I, and that he/she expressed his/her opinion on the plephical fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral c

Defendant F requested a pre-operation test to fire extinguishers, internal combustion surgery, kidney surgery, circular internal surgery, pulmonary surgery and medical professionals. While there is a high risk in the mid-term internal department, the risk of serious symptoms in the pulmonary surgery, and in the pulmonary surgery, the response that all departments are able to perform the surgery is determined to perform the surgery, and the operation was conducted prior to the surgery, such as blood transfusion and the suspension of the pulmonary surgery. D.

around 08:50 on October 10, 2016, Defendant F carried out 14:20 after he completed the surgery at around 13:25, on the 11st following the chronical surgery and pressure surgery, No. 4-5 of the Y, No. 5 to 1 of the YY, and on the 14:20-round 14:20 after he completed the surgery, he moved I to a new boundary patient room.

E. As a result of the observation of I at the new boundary patient room, around 15:50 on October 10, 2016, Defendant F began to administer knium medication at around 16:00 when cambling was measured at 30 times per minute, and blood pressure at 70m Hgs per minute. At the blood test conducted after the surgery, Defendant F confirmed that knium was 7.8mEq/L with knium 7.8mEq.

arrow