1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The party-related plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of vessel vessel processing business, etc., and the non-party C is the representative director of the plaintiff.

Defendant KB Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a corporation established to carry on insurance business, etc. in accordance with the Insurance Business Act, and Defendant B is an insurance solicitor belonging to the Defendant Co., Ltd.

B. The Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract (hereinafter “each of the instant insurance contracts”) with the Defendant Company on the recommendation of Defendant B, who was aware of the Plaintiff’s purchase of the Defendant Company’s insurance coverage, as described in the attached Table No. 1 with the Defendant Company.

(Opening Insurance Contracts are named by the sequence Nos. 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, and 10, each insured party, D, E, F, G, H, and I are the Plaintiff’s employees, and J, the insured of No. 14 insurance, is the Plaintiff’s employee.

On July 30, 2012, the insurance No. 6 was contracted by C with himself as the insured and the beneficiary in order to prepare measures for aging, but on August 29, 2012, the policyholder and the beneficiary were changed to the plaintiff.

Nos. 15 and 16, the original contractor of the insurance contract was K and L, the insured, but on May 22, 2012, the contractor and the beneficiary changed to the Plaintiff.

(F) at the time, as an employee of the plaintiff, dealt with it as an authorized person.

On June 26, 2014, the Plaintiff terminated each of the instant insurance contracts, and received the refund money.

C Defendant B’s criminal complaint against Defendant B, asserting that “Defendant B, in relation to the conclusion of each of the insurance contracts in this case, could enjoy tax benefits if they subscribed to the insurance in the name of the Plaintiff, which is a company in relation to the conclusion of each of the insurance contracts in this case, and the principal would be guaranteed if they are paid only for three years, and submitted to the Defendant Company by forging the written subscription for the insurance contract in the name of the Plaintiff in relation to No. 11 or No. 14 insurance.”