A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 7. 2. 17:45경 원주시 B에 있는 C 운영의 ‘D여관’에서 피고인의 처 E가 C를 폭행하고 있다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 원주경찰서 F지구대 소속 순경 G가 E의 인적사항을 확인하려 하자 돌연 격분하여, G에게 “야, 개새끼야, 나랑 맞짱 한번 뜨자”고 욕설을 하며 양손으로 위 G의 멱살을 잡고 흔들어 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the occurrence of cases;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment for one month to five years;

2. Scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] of the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of duties (special sponsers): In cases where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is insignificant (the scope of the recommended area and the recommended sentence] mitigation area, and one month to eight months of imprisonment.

3. Determination of sentence: In addition to the above sentencing reasons, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in full view of all the circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, the result of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments in