The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. In a place where it is difficult to identify a place where a light place is unknown in 2015, the Defendant forged a written contract under C’s name on rights and duties with a view to arbitrarily preparing a written contract, stating that “A shall not assert this right against C’s 2,532 square meters prior to the previous Yanan-gun, Seoul, and the general steel-frame structure 160 square meters and the general steel-frame structure f8 square meters on its ground, and the light f8 square meters on the roof of the steel-frame structure steel-frame,” as if C renounced renounced the right to real estate.

B. On August 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) submitted the aforementioned forged contract to a public official whose name is unknown at the Gwangju District Court; and (b) subsequently, exercised the said falsified contract as if it were duly formed.

2. The Defendant and C maintained a de facto marital relationship from April 2012 to January 2014. The date of the formation of the instant contract is May 15, 2015. The date of the formation is that C had legal disputes, such as civil litigation, after the de facto marriage with the Defendant was resolved. Therefore, the Defendant and C prepared the instant contract disadvantageous to C, and it appears that there was no reason to set up the instant contract and the Defendant’s health.

On the other hand, as to the facts charged in this case, the Defendant and C began de facto marital relations around the year 2013 and came up with the assistance of a secretary to a certified judicial scrivener office in order to resolve disputes in the future regarding the real estate stated in the facts charged entered in the facts charged which was registered under the Defendant’s name, and they did not know the reasons indicated in May 15, 2015.

In light of the following circumstances recognized by the records of this case, C received a return of the seal imprint from the Defendant on January 2014 after the de facto marital relationship with the Defendant was terminated, as follows: C’s seal imprint affixed to the contract of this case is identical to C’s seal imprint; and C’s seal imprint was also identical to C’s seal imprint;

The seal imprints are written, and the seal imprints are personal.