1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance is revoked.

2. The plaintiff's primary claim against the defendant.

1. If a copy of the complaint, an original copy, etc. of the judgment were served by public notice as to the legitimacy of the appeal for subsequent completion, barring any special circumstance, the defendant was unaware of the service of the judgment without negligence, and in such a case, the defendant was unable to comply with the peremptory period due to a cause not attributable to him/her and thus, the appeal for subsequent completion may be filed within two weeks from the date on which such cause

The "date on which the cause ceases to exist" refers to the time when the party or legal representative becomes aware of the fact that the judgment was rendered, and further the fact that the judgment was served by service by public notice is known.

In ordinary cases, only when a party or legal representative peruses the records of the case or receives a new original of the judgment, it shall be deemed that he/she became aware of the fact that the judgment was served by public notice.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2004Da8005 Decided February 24, 2006. A judgment of the first instance court was rendered after a copy of the complaint and the date for pleading, etc. were served by public notice, and the original copy of the judgment of the first instance was also served on the Defendant by public notice. On December 9, 2019, the Defendant was issued an original copy of the claim attachment and collection order ( Daejeon District Court Decision 2019TTTT 67370) with enforcement title, and on December 18, 2019, submitted the instant written appeal to the court of first instance on December 18, 2019, may be recognized either by record or by record Nos. 1 and 2.

According to the above facts, the defendant was unable to observe the appeal period due to the failure of the court of first instance to know that the judgment was served by service by public notice without negligence.

Since the Defendant filed a subsequent appeal within 2 weeks from the time when he became aware of the fact that the judgment of the first instance was served by public notice, the instant subsequent appeal is lawful.

2. Judgment on the merits

A. The Plaintiff, a certified tax accountant of the basic facts, is related to the “litigation” lawsuit requested by B.